
Did you use AI for design in 2025?
AI for design relatively flew under the radar this year.
While everyone obsessed over AI coding tools, design tools quietly got damn good.
Figma entered the space in May with Make. UX Pilot launched and actually understood users. Google entered the race with Stitch - allegedly still an experiment.
Most designers haven’t explored much beyond Make. But those who did have found an edge.
I tested 10 design tools. Here are the winners across the entire design workflow.
🎁 A quick gift before we begin
We put together an AI Survival Hackbook for 2026: a practical guide on how AI changed work between 2019–2025, what will matter next year, and how professionals are quietly using AI for leverage (not hype).
It includes:
Clear breakdowns of what shifted in 2025
Ready-to-use prompts & workflows
Real automation ideas you can set up
It’s free for the next two weeks.
Best for Full Product Design
Stitch generates the entire product, or entire user flows at the very least, if you prompt it to.
I asked it for a "dashboard" and I got: the dashboard, login flow, settings page, mobile version, and three color schemes.
Then I tested it with "redesign India's Income Tax portal." Remember?
90 seconds later: complete filing experience.
Dashboard, refund status, ITR flow, and past returns view.
It was released May 2025 by Google Labs, roughly same as Figma Make.
Product teams at Stripe and Coinbase use it for first-draft explorations today.
Runner-up: Figma Make (better for mobile, weaker systems thinking)
Best for Prototyping
My favourite part about Make is that it gives you working prototypes.
Designs you can interact with.
The buttons click, modals open and notifications expand.
You can hand this to a stakeholder and they can click through it like a real app.
And it integrates seamlessly into Figma.
The catch: Slowest of the bunch. Acceptable tradeoff since it still saves net time spent.
Runner-up: UX Pilot
Best for User-centric Design
Since the income-tax-portal test, UX Pilot has only grown on me.
It has further leaned into being user centric. And I love that.
Remember the portal results?
Making the safe choices, but not in a conservative way.
Strategic color selections - green for good, orange for action needed, gray for neutral.
Clear hierarchy - your eyes land first where they are meant to.
The fun part: UX Pilot was fastest to generate, had the lowest wow factor, but was the only design I'd actually trust during tax season.
The caveat: Too minimal sometimes. Hides complexity rather than organizing it.
Runner-up: Figma Make (better feature coverage, worse psychology)
Best for Design-to-Code
Upload a screenshot. Get production-ready React code in 30 seconds.
The v2 update in April 2025 and I know engineers who use it all the time.
The limitation: React + Tailwind only.
Runner-up: Figma Dev Mode with AI (improved a lot, still not as precise)
Best for Microinteractions
Anyone can now build those butter-smooth microinteractions that you see on Linear, Raycast and the likes.
Describe the interaction: "Button scales to 0.95 on press, bounces back with elastic easing, ripples outward."
That’s it.
Then you can exports to Lottie/Rive.
It understands animation principles well.
Tell it "make this feel responsive" and it applies: 40ms touch feedback, spring physics, reduced motion preferences.
The barrier: Steep learning curve.
If you've never animated before, expect a week of confusion.
The tool assumes you understand easing curves, timing functions, and spring physics.
Runner-up: Motion Copilot by LottieFiles
Most Improved
Tough category. We only saw tools get really good midway through the year.
And the space is relatively nascent so major competitors including the big ones are still improving and have a long way to go.
Still if I had to pick a winner, I’d choose Make, especially considering how heavily criticised it was at the start.
Seamlessly having integrated into Figma and hence becoming part of most designers’ existing workflows already, it takes the cake.
Runner-up: Framer AI (not a gimmick anymore)
Bust of the Year
Adobe promised "AI-powered UI design in Photoshop and Illustrator."
What we got: Generative fill for mockups that look like 2015 Dribbble shots.
Adobe simply bolted AI onto tools designed for print and photo editing.
Firefly generates designs that look good in screenshots but fall apart when you try to use them.
It has no inherent understanding of user flows, or any design system awareness
The lesson: AI can't save a tool that's wrong for the job.
Best overall AI design tool (MVP)
This one hurt.
UX Pilot is my personal favorite. I use it more than any other tool.
But "best tool I use" isn't the same as "best tool for designers."
Figma Make wins because of where it lives.
Every designer already uses Figma.
The components and design system live in Figma The team reviews and handoffs happen in Figma It is seamlessly integrated.
And is a good product. Why would anyone bother switching tools?
Teams at actual companies (not just early adopters) adopted Make because it enhanced their existing workflows, so the switching cost was negligible.
UX Pilot makes better individual designs and Stitch is faster for exploration.
But Figma Make is the tool that won the market.
Going into 2026
The tools have got good at generating interfaces.
But they just generate the same interface every time.
Stitch, Make, UX Pilot - they all default to the same old SaaS aesthetic i.e, clean, boring and minimal.
None of these tools understand your brand yet.
2026's challenge: brand-aware generative design.
AI that captures your design language and applies it consistently.
The company that cracks that owns the next year, and the decade maybe.
Until next time,
Vaibhav 🤝🏻
If you read till here, you might find this interesting
#AD 1
AI-native CRM
“When I first opened Attio, I instantly got the feeling this was the next generation of CRM.”
— Margaret Shen, Head of GTM at Modal
Attio is the AI-native CRM for modern teams. With automatic enrichment, call intelligence, AI agents, flexible workflows and more, Attio works for any business and only takes minutes to set up.
Join industry leaders like Granola, Taskrabbit, Flatfile and more.
#AD 2
Media Leaders on AI: Insights from Disney, ESPN, Forrester Research
The explosion of visual content is almost unbelievable, and creative, marketing, and ad teams are struggling to keep up. Content workflows are slowing down, and teams can't find the right assets quickly enough.
The crucial question is: How can you still win with the influx of content and keep pace with demand?
Find out on Jan 14, 2026, at 10am PT/1pm ET as industry leaders—including Phyllis Davidson, VP Principal Analyst at Forrester Research, and former media executive Oke Okaro as they draw on their deep media research and experience from ESPN, Disney, Reuters, and beyond.
In the webinar, "The Future of Content Workflows: How AI is Powering the Next Wave," you’ll learn:
The forces reshaping content operations
Where current systems are falling short
How leading organizations are using multimodal AI to extend their platforms
What deeper image and video understanding unlocks for monetization
Get clear insight and actionable perspective from the leaders who built and transformed top media and entertainment organizations.












